Mandy
The Kansas Attorney General’s Office has determined that the City of Galena improperly entered a closed session during a council meeting held in June.
According to the AG, the discussion — centered on contracts — did not fall under any of the state-approved reasons that allow a governing body to meet privately.
Complaint Filed By Local Resident
The issue surfaced after Tanner Walker, a Galena resident, submitted a formal complaint regarding the June 16 council meeting.
During that session, city leaders voted to go into executive session to talk about contract matters.
State officials later confirmed that contract discussions alone do not qualify as a valid exception under the Kansas Open Meetings Act.
Why The Meeting Violated State Law
While Kansas law provides flexibility in how city councils conduct their meetings, there are still specific legal standards that must be met for a closed session.
In this instance, Galena’s city officials failed to meet those standards, resulting in a violation.
Required Remedial Actions For The City
The AG’s office has instructed Galena leaders to correct the violation through one of several remedial options, which include:
- Repeating the meeting in full compliance with open-meeting rules
- Re-doing votes or actions taken during the unlawful session
- Providing training to city council members to ensure they fully understand the Kansas Open Meetings Act
Although the case itself is now considered closed, state officials emphasized that they will continue monitoring Galena’s future meetings to ensure ongoing compliance.
The Kansas Attorney General’s determination underscores the importance of transparency in local government.
By improperly closing a meeting to discuss contracts, Galena’s city officials breached state requirements and must now take corrective steps to restore trust and meet legal standards.
Moving forward, the AG’s office will maintain oversight to make sure the city follows all open meeting laws accurately and consistently.
FAQs
Why was Galena’s closed meeting ruled illegal?
Because the council discussed contract matters, which are not permitted topics for a closed session under the Kansas Open Meetings Act.
What happens next for the city?
Galena must complete one of the required remedial actions, such as redoing the meeting or providing council training.
Will the Attorney General continue to watch Galena’s meetings?
Yes. Although the case is closed, the AG’s office will monitor future meetings to ensure compliance with state law.